September 7, 2014
I’ve had a number of people ask me about Igor Kufayev, a rapidly emerging spiritual teacher who twice has appeared on Buddha at the Gas Pump and who has posted 150 + Youtube.com videos. I replied in the affirmative to these people, letting them know that I thought Igor was good and interesting.
Even though I thought that Igor was good and interesting (at least as a spiritual speaker), I didn’t think he had “cracked the cosmic code,” because, unlike me, he doesn’t integrate the consciousness process and conductivity. Thanks to his Capricorn Sun and Gemini Moon, he’s an agile and loquacious communicator (as attested to by his multitude of Youtube.com videos) – but is he a fully Enlightened one? Never one to shy away from asking such direct questions, I posted the following question at one of his YouTube videos:
L. Ron Gardner: “Igor, have you cut the Heart-knot, meaning that you now perpetually abide in Sahaj Samadhi and radiate unbrokenly to Infinity via Amrita Nadi? Or are you still on the "path," and periodically experience the Hridayam?”
Igor’s evasive, muddled response, which follows, answered my question, and told me all that I need to know about him:
Igor Kufayev: “Whatever I reply, L.…
Read the full article
August 31, 2014
Although I couldnât have âcracked the cosmic codeâ without the help of Daâs Dharma, particularly his early teachings on radical understanding, over time, as I expanded my study of spirituality beyond Daâs teachings, Advaita Vedanta, and Zen Buddhism, I began to encounter the principal sources from which his Dharma derives.
When I read the first edition of the âKnee of Listeningâ in 1973, I thought it was oh so cool and original when Da asked the Shakti to stay with him and likened spiritual seekers to Narcissus. Then, ten years ago, when I read the Gnostic classic âThe Secret Book of Johnâ (translated by Stevan Davies), I discovered where he got the Narcissus metaphor and the idea of asking the Shakti (the Gnostic equivalent of Spirit) to stay with him.
In the âParadox of Instruction,â which I read shortly after it was published in 1977, Da discoursed on Divine Ignorance, the idea that we donât know what anything really is, we only know about things.… Read the full article