Tibetan Dzogchen, over the past twenty-five years or so, has become a popular spiritual practice for Western Buddhists. Numerous Tibetan gurus who teach it have migrated to the West, and numerous translations/commentaries of canonical Dzogchen texts have been published. I have participated in a number of Dzogchen groups and have read at least a couple dozen Dzogchen texts. Although I really like a few of these Dzogchen texts –particularly ones by Longchen Rabjam (1308-1364) and Namkhai Norbu (currently teaching)--I do not believe any of them manages to fully elaborate Dzogchen, the Great Perfection. Consequently, just as I have upgraded Christian mysticism with my text Electrical Christianity, I likewise believe I can upgrade Dzogchen.
As Tibetan Dzogchen teachers themselves make clear, Dzogchen, the Great Perfection, is primordial; hence it existed prior to Buddhism (and Bon), which means that Tibetan Buddhism (and Bon) do not have exclusive claim to its Dharma. Nonetheless, as far I know, no one other than me has attempted to elaborate Dzogchen in a context beyond Buddhism (or Bon). I believe that my expertise and experience in multiple spiritual Dharmas (Advaita Vedanta, Kashmir Shaivism, Christian Hermeticism, Zen, and Daism) and ability to think outside of a single Dharma “box,” uniquely qualifies me to upgrade Dzogchen by considering and presenting it in a trans-Tibetan context.
Because this is just an article and not a book, I cannot present the full version of my elaboration of Dzogchen; but I can, and now will, present a brief outline of it.
Dzogchen, as I understand and teach it, is the same spiritual practice as the mystical Eucharist, only from a nondual perspective. There are just two fundamental practices in Dzogchen –Trekcho (“cutting through”) and Togal (“leaping over”), and it couldn’t be clearer to me that Trekcho equates with the practice of Divine Communion (Plugged-in-Presence) and Togal with the practice of receiving or conducting Divine Power (or Clear-Light Energy). When one practices Trekcho (Divine Communion), one attempts to “cut through” one’s “spiritual materialism” (one’s grasping after thoughts and objects) and “break on through” to the “Other Side” (Divine Power, the Clear-Light continuum). And once one is “initiated” (or baptized) by this Divine Power (the Holy Spirit), one thereafter can (at times) directly “leap over” (or bypass) one’s “spiritual materialism” and directly connect to and channel the Spirit-current (or Clear-Light Continuum). Consequently, Tibetan gurus generally rate Togal a higher (or more advanced) practice than Trekcho. But in reality, the two practices are complementary, and together constitute the mystical Eucharist (connecting to the Holy Spirit and receiving its Blessing Power, or Light-Energy).
I could in this article continue to elaborate Dzogchen from other Dharma perspectives (such as Hindu Sat-Chit-Ananda), but I will leave that for another day and another post. Meanwhile, if you are in interested in a more in-depth “translation” of Tibetan Buddhist Dzogchen into the true, or mystical, Christian Eucharist, I suggest you check out my book Electrical Christianity, in which I not only compare the two practices, but also provide a paradigm—the Electrical Spiritual Paradigm (ESP)—that radically, spiritual-energetically, explains how they “work,” or en-Light-en disciples.
Dzogchen for Smarties
Previous post: University Professors, A Sorry Lot
Next post: Update and Announcement







{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
could you please elaborate more about dzogchen. thanks
the most important part of the “how” of Trekcho is that you use the mind as the cutting through tool, and that mind comes from the point of view of pristine awareness, not your normal impure mind… in other words, it’s an inside job…
You have knowledge and experience in spiritual field .I feel compassionate towards you .you have viveka,vairagya is needed .
Ron
Can you give me advice i do a lot of meditation and I am trying to realise enlightenment but which path has realised enlightenment is it advaita vedanta where the end result seems to be realising that you are brahman which is permanent and everywhere or is it buddhism where they say that the highest level is emptiness or the middle way of nagarjuna where there is no self!! They seem to be totally opposite. You say that sri ramana maharsi is enlightened and if so which text would you recommend? I’ve been told to absorb myself in the 40 vreses on reality which contains everything to realise enlightenment. Another guy who seems to get praise as well as criticism is Adi da samraj….would you recommend him as teaching the truth although he gets accused of developing a cult following and having lots of money! If you do rate him as enlightened which teaching of his would you recommend? I do have his book called the pneumaton. One last thing what do you think of bhakti yoga which the Hindus say that it’s perfect for this time cycle of kali yoga because the human race is dull. I would really appreciate a good reply so I can take your advice to advance. Jason
Hi Jason,
If Advaita Vedanta meditation interests you, read “Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi” (avoid the dumbed-down Inner Directions version), “Sri Ramana Gita,” “Sat-Darshana Bhahya and Talks with Maharshi,” and the chapter Who Am I in my book “Zen Mind, Thinker’s Mind.”To get clear on Nararjuna’s “middle way,” read my book “Zen Mind, Thinker’s Mind.” “The Pneumaton” is a book I recommend, but the best Adi Da meditation instruction books, IMO, are early versions of “The Knee of Listening” and “The Method of the Siddhas,” written under the names of Franklin Jone or Bubba Free John, and “Hridaya Rosary,” written under Adi Da.
There is no guru, past or present, whose teachings I fully agree with. In fact, I could write a book elaborating my differences with Adi Da. And if someone offers me, say, 200 K to do it, I will! Is there an individual self? It couldn’t be clearer to me that an individual phenomenal bodymind self is born, lives, and dies. But the phenomenal self must be differentiated from the transcendental Self (or Buddha-nature).
You will have to determine for yourself what meditation practices match your taste, temperament, and capacity.
Ron